CTO Comparison FAQ
Common questions CTOs ask when evaluating TeamStation AI against nearshore vendors like BairesDev, Globant, Toptal, and others. These FAQs focus on vetting, compliance, SLAs, and total cost of ownership.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Why should CTOs compare TeamStation AI to vendors like BairesDev or Globant?
- Because legacy vendors sell resumes, while TeamStation AI delivers a fully integrated platform. CTOs need visibility into cognitive vetting, device security, and compliance — not just hourly rates.
- How does Axiom Cortex™ reduce mis-hire risk?
- Our cognitive AI evaluates how engineers think, not just what they claim. It reduces false positives by over 90%, providing an auditable 'Cognitive Fingerprint' instead of relying on resume theater.
- What compliance advantages does TeamStation AI offer?
- We provide corporate-owned, MDM-managed devices, SSO/SCIM from day one, and REPSE-aware Employer of Record services across LATAM. This ensures enterprise audit readiness out of the box.
- What is the difference in TCO compared to traditional staff augmentation?
- Traditional vendors hide costs in vendor management, compliance gaps, and rework. TeamStation AI provides a predictable, all-inclusive TCO that’s often 40–60% lower when factoring in velocity and compliance.
- Can we trial a pod before committing long-term?
- Yes. Many clients start with a 3–6 month engagement focused on a specific outcome. This lets you validate cadence, security posture, and cost efficiency before scaling further.
- Which vendor model is better for large-scale hiring?
- If you need massive resume funnels and already have HR, IT, and compliance handled in-house, large vendors may work. If you need velocity, security, and CFO-ready reporting, TeamStation AI is designed for you.